A few notes about moderation
Mar 25th, 2008 by Rebecca
I generally take a pretty open stance towards comments on my blog - I welcome a diversity of opinion, and will generally allow most stuff to be posted.
However, I will draw the line at some things, as I’ve had to do with this post. I’ll even argue with the concern trolls, but I will not allow glaringly transphobic, misogynist, racist or ablist crap - as with one particular commenter there who has tried to post long screeds about how the victim in that case was a liar and deserved to be outed and bashed.
I find the response to that post quite interesting - it’s perhaps my popular post, and it’s the one where I get most hits from Google, by people searching for the names of the two police officers concerned, Tyrone Stacey and Brendan Ritson. I mightn’t be surprised at that, as it’s one of the few recent incidents in this country at least of transwomen being targeted for violence. However, in light of the comments I keep getting (some which I’ve moderated) - “but she was a well-known transgender!” (as if this is somehow an excuse) or “but you don’t know these nice boys!” (as if their actions didn’t speak for themselves), I start to wonder about the interest of cissexual folks in this case. Why would - a couple of months after this case dropped out of the news cycle - people be searching blogs to tell this little transwoman that outing and bashing people like me is perfectly justifiable, that we’re not really human?
Oh, totally. There is always a role for a little bit of censorship. Complete and absolute freedom of speech is an impossible ideal in any media, especially the Internet - if nothing else we’d be drowning in a flood of porn ads and “hilarious” goatse-style pranks. A line has to be drawn somewhere, and the person who owns the medium generally gets to draw it.
Nice blog you’ve got here, by the way. I’m impressed.
Hey, thanks! Good to see you dropping by!