“Uh oh” is right…
May 6th, 2008 by Rebecca
via The Bilerico Project:
The American Psychiatric Association has named the members of it’s working group to reassess the inclusion of Gender Identity Disorder in the forthcoming new edition of the DSM, the DSM-V. It could almost not possibly be worse. The list reads like a who’s-who of obsessed creeps who’ve made a career out of attacking trans healthcare.
Let’s start with the chair of the working group. It’s Kenneth Zucker, of Toronto’s notorious Clarke Institute. As Mercedes Allen notes over there, he’s notorious for his use of “ex-gay” style “reparative therapy” to try and beat the transness out of trans kids. This is a man who shouldn’t even be allowed to practice medicine, let alone be put in this sort of position of responsibility.
It doesn’t improve from there. The next one on the list is none other than Ray Blanchard, the creator of the theory of “autogynephilia”. This is a theory that has zero credibility outside of right-wing circles, is patently unscientific, and relies on ignoring the entire existence of transmen to even pretend for it to make sense. How in the hell was this man let anywhere near this working group?
There’s one clinician on the list who’s actually well-known for dealing with trans issues in a realistic context: Peggy Cohen-Kettenis. It isn’t a bad choice; she’s prominent and supports proper healthcare, but I’ve read some kinda odd work of hers that did take on board a bit of Blanchard’s work - perhaps the only respected psychiatrist to do so. It could certainly be worse, but I ain’t thrilled about it either.
There’s only one other person on the list who seems to have any knowledge about transpeople at all, and that’s an endocrinological specialist, Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg. Unfortunately, he looks pretty terrible too: according to Robbie: “Meyer-Bahlburg seems pretty ambivalent about whether trans people should be treated at all, especially trans youth, and thinks that Money’s notorious ideas about intersex treatment need “only minor modifications”".
Of the rest (according to Zoe Brain in comments), we have a guy who specialises in violent male sex offenders, a guy who specialises in female orgasmic disorders, a guy who specialises in sexual dysfunction, a sex therapist, and another specialist in sex offenders. None of these last five have any relevant experience in dealing with actual gender issues.
This is nothing short of a nightmare. Think of it this way: what if you were queer, and the decision over your future legal status just got handed to Peter LaBerbera?
I just don’t even know what to say. It’s obvious that WPATH weren’t even consulted in choosing the makeup of this working group. I’m hoping to god that Cohen-Kettenis and some of the randoms can inject some sense into the process, or otherwise that the results of the working group get tossed out at a later stage, but this is just inconceivable. These people have the power to abolish trans healthcare as we know it.
Update: Mercedes Allen suggests in comments over there that the resistance to this has already started, with people pointing out that having Zucker anywhere near this group makes a mockery of the APA’s past clear opposition to reparative therapy being used against the LGBT community, and starting to link up with some of the veterans of the fight to take homosexuality out of the DSM. It’s a start, but god I hope it works.
[…] More info from people who know more about it and say it better than I do: Dented Blue Mercedes Burning Words […]
OMFG, this is scary. If this interferes with my treatment, I don’t know what I’m going to do. Who the hell thought it was a good idea to let those Zucker, Blanchard, and Bailey assholes onto the APA? Did Raymond and her friends put them up to this?
I am just so livid right now that I can’t even comment in any kind of cohesive way.
[…] Burning Words […]
“OMFG, this is scary. If this interferes with my treatment, I don’t know what I’m going to do…”
To put it into a bit of context, the DSM-V is not due out until 2011, as I understand it. These task force groups take a lot of time deliberating and debating. We do have time to fight this — which we need to do for those who follow in our path later — and Zucker, Blanchard et. al. have given us plenty of ammunition to do so.
[…] 3) Via Rebecca at Burning Words […]
GallingGalla: I have no idea how this happened. This is bigger than Raymond; I think she’s on the fringe enough that she couldn’t be expected to hold much sway with these people. The right is up to something serious here, and they have to be stopped.
Mercedes: I wasn’t for a second stating this was a done deal, but it’s a hell of a bad start. Thanks for bringing it to our attention, anyway.
[…] Her kan du lese mer om arbeidsgruppas skremmende sammensetning. […]
[…] at Burning Words there is more evidence that my previous assertion that ‘maybe there are some sane […]
WHAT THE FUCK?!?!
Did they even think of including an actual trans person amongst the working group? Or just self-appointed “experts” who make money off appropriating the voices of trans people?
I had a comment from Alice, a Dutch transgender blogger who had positive things to say about Dr. Peggy Cohen. Apparently Dr Cohen is currently working on a gender team for revision of Dutch protocols for treatment, including partial treatment for non transsexual transgenders. Alice noted that Dr. Cohen should by nature be opposed to Zucker and Blanchard.
This is a man who shouldn’t even be allowed to practice medicine, let alone be put in this sort of position of responsibility.
He isn’t. Allowed to practice Medicine, I mean. Neither is Blanchard. Their doctorates aren’t in Medicine. They’re researchers, not practitioners.